The responsibility is sole and simple, and that is to vote for Joe Biden. It is not only your duty as an American, but also your duty to the future.
In an effort to comprehend the exponential growth and the resulting large numbers associated with coronavirus, I have furnished some heuristic analogies that I hope will help display the full expanse of the disease more concretely. If we take the time to comprehend the intuition-defying numbers of confirmed and new cases of the coronavirus, these numbers, while terribly disheartening, should become more manageable.
We must remember that the crisis we face is societal, not biological. Its solution lies not in moral principles, but in political struggle.
The compromises we need to make aren’t always optimal. But ultimately, by living the way we are now and through the sacrifices that others are making, we can keep things bright for the future.
Adopting the universal PDF measure will demonstrate Princeton’s commitment to not just creating smart leaders, but empathetic leaders, who prioritize their communities and vulnerable populations in times of need.
Columnist Julia Chaffers argues that the current government response to coronavirus in the United States prioritizes profits over lives.
Editorial Assistant Kate Lee discusses the rise of journalism’s importance amid the coronavirus crisis.
Structural change requires collective action: action that is possible only if we all take responsibility for our choices and for making better ones.
Three months before I planned on having these thoughts (i.e. at graduation), I am having them: will our friendships survive?
With examinations, the pressures of job applications or graduate schools, and our own internal wills to maintain high GPAs looming over each semester, we often forget that learning can be fun. The coronavirus, while wreaking havoc in almost all aspects of our lives, can — if we make the most of the opportunity it has provided us — bring back the joys associated with being curious.
This is the life that we are going to increasingly have to live if we want a shot at limiting global warming to two degrees Celsius, a threshold that climate scientists believe marks the difference between manageable and catastrophic global change.
While its motto is “love of learning is the guide of life,” a cheeky Princeton parody of it could be “love of science is the guide to Phi Beta Kappa.”
The ultimate goal of all of these initiatives should not be alienation of our planet. Rather, it should be to promote a culture and global worldview that sees humans and nature as inextricably linked and that recognizes the need to preserve one, nature, in order to keep the other, human, healthy.
No one is too old — or too queer, or too poor, or too black, or too disabled, or too incarcerated, or too undocumented — to be worthy of life, or worthy of grief.
Records show that STEM concentrators have won the majority of Shapiro Prizes every year since they were established, despite comprising half or less of the student body.
We applaud Princeton’s previous decisions to revise policy when confronted with the realities of the pandemic and encourage similar action before the disparate effects of the current grading policy become even more self-evident.
The repercussions of this repulsive xenophobia will only result in the loss of American lives and shattering of unity.
While most of us have returned to our respective homes, school work isn’t the only thing we should be worrying about.
The Editorial Board calls on the University to impose a blanket P/D/F policy for all students.
Casually timing your consumption of news is doable, and it stops you from sacrificing chunks of your day to get over-read instead of well-read.
