A heated debate over the University's policy on cohabitation, inspired by a Daily Princetonian column by Jason Sheltzer '08, took place Wednesday evening in the Whig Hall Senate chamber.
The main issue was whether or not students would choose to live with their opposite-sex significant other if given the option.
Sheltzer participated in the debate, arguing together with Dan Greco '06 that the University should allow cohabitation. Cody May '07 and Kevin Joyce '09 argued against them. The debate was moderated by Senate presidents Aaron Spolin '08 and Shiram Harid '08.
Sheltzer discussed existing cohabitation policies at other universities such as Brown, Haverford and Swarthmore, saying that legal cohabitation at Princeton is "inevitable."
Sheltzer and Greco stressed that University students would be intelligent enough to recognize the seriousness of living in the same room as their boyfriend or girlfriend. They said they believed students would opt to live with friends of the opposite sex, but would avoid the difficulties of living as a couple.
Greco mentioned the "inherent value in getting rid of institutionalized sexism." Both debaters predicted an overall increase in happiness if roommate choices were not limited to someone of the same sex.
May, defending the current policy barring cohabitation, presented statistics on male-female cohabitation without marriage. He argued for the necessity of marriage in serious male-female relationships and stated that if students of the opposite sex want to live together, they should do so under the legal contract of marriage.
Joyce supported May's point, adding that is is "not worth changing the entire system" of the University because students can already live near each other by drawing adjacent rooms. He then presented the hypothetical example of a student who did not wish to cohabitate but was forced to by the luck of room draw.
"We're not arguing [for] forced cohabitation," Sheltzer responded. "All we're going to do is offer students the choice."
