Letters to Editor
Maintaining a narrowly defined Honor Code is tough, but criticalRegarding 'A code we can honor?' (Monday, September 22, 2003):I believe Article V of the Constitution of the Honor System is the relevant section for purposes of understanding the code.I would probably amend the code, by striking "but not limited to" from point 1, and more narrowly define specific conduct in which students pledge not to engage.As to significantly modifying the code because students exhibit a diversity of views as to what constitutes academic honesty . . .Grade inflation has already diminished the impact of exceptional performance on GPAs and class ranking, thus blurring the line between top students and everyone else.




