I’m struck by the constant rejection of, or even outright disdain for, any implication that financial or economic thinking is anything other than Devil worship, countered to the pure good of public service or simple love for a profession.
As an upperclassman myself, I realize how fun it is to be on campus with no commitments. I also understand that it’s important for freshmen to see campus as it is with all of its members, to begin to find their niche within the larger campus community. I think a compromise could be having half of freshman week freshmen-only, and the other half with all classes on campus.
Regardless of the acrimonious and often unproductive debate surrounding the policy of grade deflation, all should agree on the importance of minimizing the incidental harms that grade deflation may cause.
None of the Potter books were great literature, and truly cementing the series’ place in history would have required a thrilling finish.
Things won’t change at Princeton because the administration has no motive to appease us
The desire to fill one’s free time fighting global ills is a laudable goal. Yet if one cares about doing important work well, there are compelling reasons to avoid many of these groups.
Watching and listening to the comers and goers in Dillon that day impressed upon me the vast possibilities available to us as undergraduates and reinforced my firm belief that extracurriculars are Princeton’s lifeblood, granting our school her dynamic nature and incredible vitality.
Dickinson, McCosh, Pyne, Fine, Hibben, and even Madison and Wilson — These names are reminders of decisions, mistakes, and achievements spanning over 250 years. We ought to more fully seize our tradition and history as what makes our school, and every school, a unique place.
What we need is real open dialogue on campus. We need to step back from advocacy and accept that some issues are too complicated to fit on a poster board in a neat slogan; that some views are more nuanced than that; and that it is time to address those views and discuss them.
So never mind the risible inflatable rat, squatting outside campus doors; there may be no “shame” in Princeton’s labor relations. But, for all her greatness, Princeton may be able to do a better job of leading future leaders to learn, study and probe the causes of poverty and what public policy fixes can put the jobless back to work — with or without unions — and maybe even to help end the “blue state” vs. “red state” paralysis
The Editorial Board has previously written against this prohibition, advocating instead a shift of rush to the second semester of freshman year, and we remain convinced that such a policy would be more effective at alleviating the problems that the University believes Greek organizations cause. Nonetheless, it seems unlikely that the University will repeal its recent decision in the near future. Thus, a more pressing concern is how the administration will implement this ban next fall.
Since the first two years of coursework critically shape the rest of a student’s academic experience, we believe that comprehensive mechanisms for evaluating freshmen advisers should be put in place.
They will write it, sign it, and celebrate it: Palestine, a global affirmation of support for a people that has been oppressed for far too long. Here’s hoping our government one day joins in.
If I wanted my educators — or fellow classmates — to have convictions about how I should socialize, I would have gone to West Point or Brigham Young University. But I didn’t, and I am damn disappointed that I was misled.
There is a big trade-off involved in doing a summer internship. Instead of getting the chance to rejuvenate from the school year, you have to deal with the stress and demands of the workplace. You give up the opportunity to study or volunteer abroad or get a normal summer job in your hometown. And because most internships are unpaid, you’re paying a couple thousand dollars to do this.
