Follow us on Instagram
Try our free mini crossword
Subscribe to the newsletter
Download the app

Gellman '82 leaks his secrets for uncovering classified information

"Secrecy, Security and Self-Government: How I Find Out Secrets And Why I Publish Them" was the topic of discussion yesterday in Robertson Hall. And who could be better to give the lecture than a Pulitzer-Prize winning journalist who has mastered the art of getting the cat out of the bag?

Barton Gellman '82, a Wilson School graduate, special projects reporter for The Washington Post and a recipient of the 2002 Pulitzer Prize for coverage of the Sept. 11 attacks and the subsequent war on terrorism, discussed how and why he broke some of his biggest stories.

ADVERTISEMENT

The lecture is the second in a series, sponsored by the Wilson School and the Program in Law and Public Affairs.

Professor Christopher Eisgruber, the director of the Program in Law and Public Affairs, said the series is intended to increase knowledge about public policy.

Drawing lines

Early in his lecture, Gellman described how when releasing sensitive information that governments attempt to keep secret, "we [journalists] draw lines, but we draw them ourselves."

Gellman said he believes that a government cannot be held accountable for what it does when the public does not know what it is doing.

Gellman discussed commonly-held fallacies about reporting. For instance, some people believe that contacts will attempt to call or approach reporters out of the blue. Obtaining information is not such an easy task to undertake, Gellman said. He described how a certain amount of work must be done to get a source to talk.

'SWAG'

"How do I find out government secrets?" Gellman asked the audience rhetorically.

ADVERTISEMENT
Tiger hand holding out heart
Support nonprofit student journalism. Donate to the ‘Prince’. Donate now »

He said he uses what many refer to as the acronym SWAG (scientific wild ass guess). Assumptions are not published in a paper, but they may initiate a train of thought that leads to a final, valid piece of reporting.

Gellman emphasized the importance of analyzing information that may seem obscure or irrelevant.

Still, Gellman says he "abandons a lot more guesses than [he] confirms."

Gellman says he has been approached by government officials, including national security adviser Condoleezza Rice, and asked not to release certain details of government actions.

Responsibility

Subscribe
Get the best of the ‘Prince’ delivered straight to your inbox. Subscribe now »

One audience member at the lecture suggested that reporters, by remaining silent about certain topics, may in fact be partially responsible for harmful actions taken by government officials.

Gellman said reporters are sometimes obligated to withhold "very relevant" information, and "we [journalists] hate it."

He said being an investigative jounalist is potentially dangerous. Methods taken by reporters are often similair to those taken by those who work in intelligence gathering for governments, Gellman said.

Gellman described the painstaking effort made by journalists to get information from hesitant sources.

Back and forth

He described how he must go in a circle sometimes with his contacts. He may begin with one source who will withhold something interesting. The next person he interviews may give a different story. Then, Gellman will have to go back to the original source for verification.

If a source releases information to Gellman that he believes will be damaging to the source in some way, Gellman takes the source's status into account.

If it is a high-ranking, experienced official, he will not feel compelled to discuss with the source the possible consequences of the disclosure.

At that stage, Gellman states, "they're big people . . . grownups." If the source is low-ranking, however, he will go over the his notes with the source and see what he or she does not want to be published.

Reporters do, after all, "take steps to protect the innocent," Gellman said.