Students face a difficult decision when at least two of the classes they want to take are scheduled during conflicting times.
The year is 1998. A string of high-profile alcohol-related deaths has recently rocked prestigious universities across the country, such as MIT, the University of Virginia and Louisiana State University.
'Tis the season once again when Princeton undergraduates confront one of the more momentous decisions they must make in their lives, namely: Should they or should they not fill in the course evaluations distributed to them at the end of their courses?
What are you going to major in?" is a question I hear more and more frequently these days. Good question.
Eleven seconds into watching "Two Girls, One Cup," I knew that the apocalypse was coming, knew that names would be read aloud and beasts would slouch toward Bethlehem, knew that what I had just seen was not only the precise opposite of civilization, but also the means by which civilization would be destroyed.
With the arrival of the spring semester Princeton students will, for the first time, look to Labyrinth Books to supply their textbooks.
The "activism" on our campus is largely a regressive movement. This does not necessarily mean that the demonstrators are unsuccessful in meeting their objectives; there are many signs that point to the increasing efficacy of groups like Princeton Against Protectionism (PAP) and the Princeton Animal Welfare Society (PAWS) to affect the food we eat, the coffee we drink and the way we conduct discourses on rights.PAWS, in particular, thanks to excellent leadership that combines charisma, diligence and innovation, has risen to be one of the most visible activist groups on campus with such displays as wrapping half-naked students in cellophane to spread the message that consuming meat is unethical.
If you had heard the names Stephen Walt and John Mearsheimer one year ago, what would have popped up into your mind?
Student inputRegarding 'The hidden decision,' (Friday, Nov.
I was disappointed to see and hear about the reactions of some students to the "blackface" controversy that engulfed the campus over the past weekend.
This past week, I had the opportunity to get my first real sense of how politics really works, particularly concerning Princeton's undergraduate student body.In now USG presidential-electJosh Weinstein '09's to quest to gain the office, I decided to help my friend by acting as a liaison of sorts to the black community, partly because of his uncontested run for VP last year and also because many of my peers returned blank faces when I mentioned his name.Things looked great, until I received an email directing me to an article on a blog called IvyGate regarding photos of Weinstein in black face paint, especially addressing a caption in which he says that he and friends portrayed prominent black historical figures.I was shocked when I initially saw it, yet immediately expressed my support for him as a candidate and a person despite the egregious and insensitive nature of his actions as a freshman.
In light of the revisions to the University's policy regarding residential college advisers and alcohol, the administration's recent announcement of a broad coalition on high-risk alcohol use might appear as a belated response to student concerns. This cynicism is not entirely merited.
Policy undermines Princeton ethosRegarding 'University tightens alcohol enforcement policy,' (Thursday, Nov.
As Palestinian and Israeli leaders were meeting in the Annapolis Naval Base last week for yet another attempt at peacemaking, I remembered how my journalistic career led me to cover the Madrid peace conference back in 1991.
So here I am, up before dawn in the Palo Alto Sheraton, recovering from two days at a first-rate conference.
