We need to accept the unhappy students in our midst as a fact of every college environment. No matter how wonderful our University is, there will inevitably be students whose overall experience here is negative.
The Editorial Board accordingly urges Nassau Hall to seriously reconsider the Committee’s recommendations before formulating and issuing an official policy.
This spring break, I broke out of more than the Orange Bubble. I broke out of my natural shyness. I broke out in song. I broke out my walking shoes. I broke out my wallet. I broke out of 19 sheltered years in suburbia. I broke out of a generation of societal conditioning that demonizes those who the system fails. But most importantly, I broke out of the apathetic mindset I had cultivated since middle school when I thought that there was too much wrong with the world for me to be able to fix it.
Ms. Jones’ article admirably concludes that no one is entitled to a job and that the rest is, indeed, up to you. My only concern is her analysis of the employment market for law school graduates, which is not comparable to the employment market for recent college graduates.
With the consistent prospect of separation, the students in our residential colleges can only hope to part of artificial, temporary groupings, always planning for that last day of sophomore spring, when the ties are broken and new niches must be found, in eating clubs or elsewhere. And, of course, the search for a consistent, university-long niche actually starts far before the end of sophomore spring. So, the formula is corrupted before it ever begins to grow. In England, residential colleges, having evolved slowly to become the core of the system, work. At Harvard and Yale, they come close to being useful communities. From the outset at Princeton, they risk being almost useless.
Not long after I got here I realized that I would have to question everything I believed myself to be, everything I thought I had concluded to be true. Slowly but surely all that we stand for becomes open to question. Our goals, our belief in ourselves, others, the education system, the economy, even our belief in religion and God — everything is challenged.
One word. That’s all it will take on this day: March 29, 2012. Nothing more than one word. One word that those receiving it have undoubtedly heard a million times over, but none so great as this particular instance of this one word. One word that so many have been so ready to hear for what seems like forever. One word that has the potential to change a life forever.
According to the New York Post, last August three graduates filed a $200 million lawsuit against the NYLS alleging the school falsely claims that 90-95 percent of its graduates gain employment within nine months of graduation. They feel the school used the term “employment” to include even those jobs that do not require a J.D. at all. The graduates argue that the realistic number of those with law-related jobs is closer to 50 percent. They feel the school’s abuse of the loose definition leads prospective students to enroll based on the delusion of guaranteed employment post-graduation.
In short: In what sense do I owe my parents for the unique opportunity they’ve provided me?
The Frist Campus Center is a unique building on the Princeton campus. You probably pass through there once, twice or even several times day for various reasons, such as checking your mail or purchasing items from late meal, Cafe Viv or the C-Store. But what is it about Frist that makes it so special? What is it about Frist that makes it an exemplar among all other student spaces? The Frist Campus Center is a hub for students to come together as a community. In fact, the first line of Frist’s mission statement reads: “The Frist Campus Center is an inviting, inclusive and exciting gathering place for the entire campus community.” Unlike many failed attempts to create that elsewhere, Frist actually substantiates these goals in a couple of ways.
Ultimately, the people behind Kony 2012 have tapped into us. They have figured out how to use social media, and how to use us using social media, to spread their message so quickly and effectively, almost blindly. They have harnessed the psychology behind social media in order to promote their cause.
Policy makers might be wise in emulating, or taking lessons from, the Princeton model of wide-reaching education and contraception subsidies. The New York Times reported that a mass-media education campaign aimed at promoting and explaining safer sex could save American taxpayers around $431 million a year, while sex education and teenage-exclusive pregnancy prevention programs could potentially save $356 million. The biggest savings would come from increasing the amount of subsidized birth control available to less privileged women. At a cost of $235 million a year, such programs could save an estimated $1.32 billion annually.
Throughout our work, we kept in mind the goals of the policy to ban freshman affiliation with Greek organizations: To reaffirm the centrality of the residential colleges and eating clubs in residential and social life at Princeton; to encourage freshmen to explore a variety of interests and take full advantage of all the opportunities on campus; and to ensure that students who choose to participate in fraternities and sororities do so only after they have had the benefit of a full year on campus.
The financial, legal and logistical problems preventing the creation of a pub do not outweigh the potential benefits of a pub for the University community. As noted by the Working Group and the Editorial Board, there is a pressing need for an alternative to both the eating clubs and Nassau Street — a space where undergraduates, graduate students and faculty can socialize together.
Despite our careful upbringings and Ivy League educations, the fact remains that nearly all of us are at least a little racist. I don’t mean that we all harbor a sense of racial superiority; I mean that race contributes to our perceptions of others. I’ve seen enough students their walking pace or cross the street when confronted with people who make them “uncomfortable.” A myriad of factors go into triggering this defensiveness. It could be anything from the neighborhood to the way the strangers carry themselves to the color of the stranger’s skin. Race is one of many criteria we use when making judgments about other people.