An open letter from Faculty for Justice in Palestine
The following is an open letter and reflects the author’s views alone. For information on how to submit a piece to the Opinion section, click here.
Use the fields below to perform an advanced search of The Princetonian's archives. This will return articles, images, and multimedia relevant to your query. You can also try a Basic search
69 items found for your search. If no results were found please broaden your search.
The following is an open letter and reflects the author’s views alone. For information on how to submit a piece to the Opinion section, click here.
The following is an open letter and reflects the author’s views alone. For information on how to submit a piece to the Opinion section, click here.
The following is a guest contribution and reflects the author’s views alone. For information on how to submit a piece to the Opinion section, click here.
On Wednesday, Oct. 18, a truck with provocative images posted on it was seen on Nassau Street in Princeton falsely accusing the Dean of Princeton University’s School of Public and International Affairs (SPIA) of “coddling antisemitism” and failing to condemn the atrocities perpetrated by Hamas in Israel.
The following is an open letter and reflects the author’s views alone. For information on how to submit a piece to the Opinion section, click here.
The following is an open letter and reflects the authors’ views alone. For information on how to submit a piece to the Opinion section, click here.
In light of the right-wing Zionist attacks on Professor Satyel Larson’s plans to teach Dr. Jasbir Puar’s “The Right to Maim: Debility, Capacity, Disability” in NES 301, we, the undersigned, stand in solidarity with Professor Larson, whose teaching and scholarship we value and admire greatly.
The recent end of affirmative action sparked countless debates about the college admissions process, from the merits of class-based affirmative action to the role of the college essay. Yet no subject has received more mixed attention than legacy admissions.
Now that Princeton University has begun a process of fossil fuel divestment by committing to remove publicly traded fossil fuel companies from its endowment, it is time to apply the same logic to the University’s employee retirement plan. All of us in the Princeton community — the Board of Trustees, President Eisgruber, faculty, staff, and students — can contribute to persuading the retirement plan managers, the Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America (TIAA) and the Vanguard Group, to divest their funds of fossil fuel companies. In the interim, Princeton should supplement the available options in its retirement plan with a broad selection of fossil fuel-free funds.
The following is a guest contribution and reflects the author’s views alone. For information on how to submit an article to the Opinion section, click here.
The following is a guest contribution and reflects the author’s views alone. For information on how to submit an article to the Opinion Section, click here.
The following is a guest contribution and reflects the author’s views alone. For information on how to submit an article to the Opinion Section, click here.
I went to therapy for the first time during my freshman year of college.
The following is an open letter and reflects the author’s views alone. For information on how to submit to the Opinion Section, click here.
To the University community:
The following is an open letter and reflects the authors’ views alone. For information on how to submit to the Opinion Section, click here.
The following is an open letter and reflects the authors’ views alone. For information on how to submit to the Opinion Section, click here.
The following is an open letter and reflects the author’s views alone. For information on how to submit to the Opinion Section, click here.
The following is a guest contribution and reflects the authors’ views alone. For information on how to submit an article to the Opinion Section, click here. A version of this open letter was previously published in the Princeton Alumni Weekly.
The following petition, which can be signed here, has been signed by 160 members of the Princeton University faculty and staff as of April 18. It asks that Princeton University, by the end of this calendar year, no longer seek profit from continued investment in fossil fuels. Since this statement was opened for signature, the University has made public that: