Last fall, in the Congressional debate over authorizing President Bush to attack Iraq, one Congressman explained his support for a war with a nightmare scenario: supposing the Iraqi leader were to send a nuclear bomb to a U.S.
This past week's focus on the Organization of Women Leaders and their sponsorship of CAKE has led many students on campus to debate the value of open sexuality and eroticism.
Students should resist police harassment with the voteUndercover prohibition agents?
In a recent column I questioned the "moral clarity" now used as a cloak for a preemptive strike on Iraq.
The Organization of Women Leaders (OWL), according to its mission statement, is "dedicated to embracing the diversity, transforming the perceptions, and challenging the conventions of woman's role in our campus, community, and world." Behind such innocuous cliches, however, lies a reductive and incoherent understanding of the female human person.Perhaps it is too much to expect consistency from a "feminist" organization that in the past has sold tight "Hooters" T-shirts and put up posters with pictures of skinny, airbrushed models wearing tiny dresses and thigh-high boots.
Last December I scored for the first time ever. I am, of course, referring to the Student Course Online Registration Engine, the University's attempt to bring course registration into the 21st Century.
The morning of the thirtieth anniversary of Roe v. Wade, I stood outside the Supreme Court, freezing cold.
The eating club system is one unique to Princeton, and one of the most cherished aspects of the University's social life.
The current furor over medical malpractice continues to represent little more than the trite, ineffectual harangues of greedy insurance companies and deceived medical practitioners.
In two days the Princeton Borough Council will again vote on a proposed alcohol ordinance that would permit police to enter eating clubs to stop underage drinking.
Increasingly, the war talk emanating from Washington and in the media has taken on the tone of a moral crusade.
There are certain questions that we make a habit of asking small children, if only because it is rather difficult to have a sprightly, original conversation with someone who still wets his bed on a regular basis.
"The problem of the Twentieth Century is the problem of the color-line," wrote W.E.B. DuBois in 1903 with regard to the predominant malady plaguing American society.
In what is thus far a vain effort to comprehend the international situation I have recently spent several afternoons in WWS bowls listening to various experts.
The announcement on the Princeton web page regarding the choice of Dean Hargadon as speaker for the Senior Baccalaureate has angered me and many other Princeton students, contrary to the majority of comments made public in relation to his selection.A general aura of praise and approval toward Hargadon has been imposed on me and on many others who are uncomfortable with the Dean's conduct.
We wrote on Friday that Bicker is a good system, permitting bicker clubs to achieve a unity, enthusiasm, and year-to-year consistency that might not be possible through sign-ins.
A week ago yesterday, The New York Times ran a piece by Matthew Purdy that compared political corruption in Connecticut and New Jersey.
In Tuesday's New York Times, Professor Paul Krugman wrote that "manned space flight in general has turned out to be a bust." Reflecting on the costs of the Columbia tragedy, and the greater utility of unmanned probes and satellites, Krug-man calculates that nearly "almost all the payoff from space travel, scientific and practical has come from unmanned vehicles and satellites." He concludes that the United States should stop sending astronauts into space until it becomes "cost-effective."Although there are strong economic arguments in support of manned space flight ? witness the invention of freeze-dried foods and Velcro, products first designed for astronauts ? the economics of the matter are a secondary point.
"Bicker is an intense nightmare. Six days of passing judgment, six days of banality, or flashcards and cute comments, of emotional pleas, and bitterness are over . . . We want to forget, to wash it out of the system."Surprisingly, a disgruntled sophomore did not make this criticism last night or even last year ? it appeared in the 'Prince' in February 1967, a time when many on campus were calling for an end to Bicker entirely.
