Tomorrow is Newman's Day. As a holiday to be observed, Newman's Day presents would-be revelers with a plain physical challenge: consume 24 beers, in 24 hours.
We're surrounded by it. We depend upon it. We're losing it steadily and irreversibly. But we ignore it.Biodiversity: the sum of life on Earth.
Before I launch into the subject of this week's column, I feel compelled to report my outrage of the month: After the Associated Press reported last week that 966 people were massacred in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, I called the New York Times and The Washington Post to see whether those papers had correspondents in the country.
Like many of my fellow citizens I found myself caught up in the drama of Jessica Lynch, the young American prisoner of war thrillingly rescued from an Iraqi hospital.
As of this writing, there are 4,098,614 users signed on to the KaZaa network, sharing 889,946,455 files.
Juan Chavez is going to be murdered tomorrow. I am not a prophet, but I know that tomorrow he will be killed by the state of Texas.
The Dixie Chicks were never particularly beloved among the intellectual and academic elite, but since making recent remarks that were critical of President Bush leading up to the war in Iraq, many leading figures on the Left have decried efforts to remove their music from the airwaves.
If you've been to the airport in the past year or so, you've probably been impressed at the skill and efficiency of the new Transportation Security Administration ? the folks who screen passengers on the way to the gate.
As juniors, we have often found class officer elections predictable, even boring. The officers elected during our first weeks on campus have easily won reelection up through the ranks.However, the aura of inevitability that usually surrounds class elections was shattered last night when Azalea Kim '05 and Christopher Lloyd '06 both beat out incumbent candidates for their class' presidencies.
One unique feature of being a college newspaper editor is that it sometimes gives you the chance to wake up in the morning and be amazed at the mistakes you made the night before ? even in the middle of the week.
Imagine this. One night Dean Malkiel is sitting in her office trying to think of a solution to grade inflation.
Everyone who knows me has heard the recitation of my computer woes. They began shortly after I started at Princeton ? my computer just stopped working.
Rhetoric is a difficult art. The Roman statesman Cicero writes at length about the three styles: grand, middle, and plain, which are pretty much like they sound.
The votes from this weekend's Honor Code referendum are in, and they make several things clear.First, a majority of undergraduates value the distinctive trust, responsibility and ownership of a fully student-run Honor Code.
Occasionally I get emails questioning my ideas, my facts and especially my topics. They laugh about my quest to fulfill every southern stereotype, just so I can win those awkward moments of "Hey, you're from Alabama?
Anyone who has followed the debate surrounding President Tilghman's fourth high-profile female appointment knows that deep down this is not a debate about gender.
It's been over a week since I turned in my thesis. Leaving the English department, I had visions of long afternoons in the sun, road trips, movies, staying out late and getting up even later.
Editors' Note: Professor John Fleming's weekly column from last Monday ('A Free Ride at Princeton') drew sharp criticism from some graduate students, including leaders of the Graduate Student Government.
The upcoming Supreme Court decision over the University of Michigan's admission policy ? one that is dividing the Presidential cabinet, rousing zealous political debates and questioning the principles on which our society is grounded ? was recently the subject of an undergraduate-wide USG referendum.
Last weekend's referendum on Honor Code reform was a travesty. Officers of the University Student Government and Honor Committee blatantly sought to pervert the vote and depress voter participation, deliberately obscuring the substance of the issues at stake.
