The incoming and outgoing executive editor for opinions sit down with host Michael Medeiros to discuss this semester's top columns and debates.
While “The University” is not engaged in an intentional campaign to destroy the clubs, it has been actively pursuing policies that are not in the best interest of the continued survival of Prospect Avenue. The proverbial Road to Hell is always paved with good intentions.
The underlying question is thus: When one has issues or problems that one would not feel appropriate revealing to one’s superiors and colleagues — the latter often being your closest friends — to whom does one turn?
My friend was carrying a heavy bag of corpses down the Street. When I offered to help her with it, she opened a can of whoopass on me.
Ask yourself: when is the last time you ever ventured, really ventured, outside the Orange Bubble, physically or psychologically? I don’t mean taking that trip to Panera. (Good use of “that” to create implied familiarity.)
Much more than interdisciplinarity, however, is lost — I’ll risk incurring the wrath of some by calling it culture — when students of physics and literature consider each other to be fools because the former don’t care what century Chaucer lived in and the latter have never heard of Boyle’s law.
After being here at Princeton for almost a whole semester, I can testify that Princeton has created an environment where not only is it easy to remain a religious Jew, but it is possible to get exposure to Judaism even when one does not seek it out.
On Dean's Date eve, the 'Prince' brings back a very timely column from five years ago.
The University’s current course of continuing to buttress the four-year colleges, flooding them with resources and expanding their size, will kill off more eating clubs unless residency and meal plans are unlinked.
The 'Prince' brings back a timely column from six years ago.
The creative writing program has become more and more self-important in its dealings with the outside world.
It was all a psychology experiment! A recent thesis project underscores the need to speak up for free debate on campus.
The housing office should reevaluate its fire safety policies and make changes that improve the quality of student life without seriously increasing the risk of accidents.
Though Republicans came close to using the so-called “nuclear option” in 2005, the last time it was actually done was in 1975. The Senate must take action, and it must do so now.
When it comes to unique thinking and creativity, it really is a matter of “use it or lose it.” Many students — and I count myself as one of their number — have all but lost the ability to express themselves creatively.