Meaningful student input in the nascent stages of an initiative is necessary to create appropriate, informed policies for the University community. Therefore, the administration should regularly distribute a "policy newsletter" to the student body to inform students as to what new policies are on the University's drawing boards. This newsletter would not only alert students about new policies under consideration but also elicit student input during the most crucial phase of planning, when the policy is still malleable and its course not yet fixed. Such a newsletter would provide much-needed transparency in University policymaking. For example, the original plan to add Spelman 7 and 8 to Whitman could have been described to students as one strategy under consideration to expand options for independent and residential college students, allowing students to share their concerns and suggest alternatives before a seemingly final decision had been made.
For student views to be reflected in final policy, the newsletter must be coupled with a variety of mechanisms for student feedback, which might include electronic bulletin boards as well as open forums or workshops. Furthermore, the USG could be tasked with the responsibility of soliciting student comments through e-mail and meetings, synthesizing the responses and communicating the variety of ideas and reactions to the administration. Under this arrangement, students would be able to easily contribute their ideas, and the USG would act as an effective liaison to the administration.
The USG and student publications are expected to report on and react to a policy once it is announced, but they should not have to undertake extensive investigations into the inner-workings of the administration to uncover basic policies in their formative state. The University should voluntarily provide students with this information. Direct communication from the administration to the students would appropriately give students greater responsibility to improve the University by ensuring that policymaking reflects their ideas and experiences. Open dialogue of this kind between students and administrators can help ensure that the University remains on track toward creating a better Princeton now and in the future.
Read More
Keep academic authority in human hands
Lily Halbert-AlexanderThe Trump administration’s attacks on research and higher education as well as a blind reliance on AI chatbots are reflective of a societal backslide: a commodification of knowledge that prioritizes “efficiency” over the messy process of getting to an answer, where nuances are flattened and the truth is fungible.
The Trump administration’s attacks on research and higher education as well as a blind reliance on AI chatbots are reflective of a societal backslide: a commodification of knowledge that prioritizes “efficiency” over the messy process of getting to an answer, where nuances are flattened and the truth is fungible.
What do we owe society for a Princeton education?
Jia Cheng ShenThe social and moral responsibility that comes with receiving a degree subsidized by both private generosity and public trust is significant.
The social and moral responsibility that comes with receiving a degree subsidized by both private generosity and public trust is significant.
Notes from a so-called enemy’s classroom
Jennifer JenningsIt wasn’t revolutionary. It was homework. But it was homework that asked: how do we build schools that work for all kids? Inclusion, after all, is the “I” in DEI. That’s what we’re thinking about together. And caring about each other’s experiences and opportunities, it turns out, isn’t something you can outlaw.
It wasn’t revolutionary. It was homework. But it was homework that asked: how do we build schools that work for all kids? Inclusion, after all, is the “I” in DEI. That’s what we’re thinking about together. And caring about each other’s experiences and opportunities, it turns out, isn’t something you can outlaw.