Follow us on Instagram
Try our daily mini crossword
Play our latest news quiz
Download our new app on iOS/Android!

Letters to the Editor

An inaccurate portrayal of Sharon and IDF

Taufiq Rahim's recent (September 24) opinion piece inaccurately presents the role of Ariel Sharon and the Israel Defense Forces at Sabra and Shatilla. His use of the word "cleanse" to describe Operation Peace for the Galilee unfairly and incorrectly implies that the Israeli military action intended to ethnically cleanse Lebanon. Mr. Rahim ignores the years of terror operations conducted against Northern Israel, and the Israelis who died at the hands of Lebanese-based PLO terrorists, including 23 children murdered in their elementary school in Maalot on May 5, 1974.

ADVERTISEMENT

Further, there is no evidence to support his claim that the Israeli army facilitated the massacres. The Kahane Commission, which investigated the incidents, reported in 1983 that neither the IDF, nor Ariel Sharon himself, had any role in nor knowledge of the massacres, nor did they in any way contribute directly to the killings. The commission, ultimately, faulted the top brass of the IDF, including its intelligence services, for not anticipating that such a massacre might take place.

Mr. Rahim's only cited source is The Independent's Robert Fisk, who, as Andrea Levin of the Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting points out, has a pattern of "factual recklessness and cinematic manipulation" in his reports on the subject.

I commend Mr. Rahim for his admirable attempt to raise our collective consciousness about the tragedies that did occur in Bosnia, Rwanda and at Sabra and Shatilla. However, his erroneous accusations against Israel and its Prime Minister Ariel Sharon have no place in a free and open debate. Josh Waldman '05

Princeton University should divest from the United States

Princeton University unquestionably has a responsibility to divest (Should the US and Princeton divest from Israel? editorial, Sept. 27) . . . from the United States of America. The U.S. has been conducting an illegal occupation of nearly 1/3 of the territory of the Republic of Mexico for over 150 years. The Princeton community must not allow this criminal travesty to continue. After stealing vast quantities of pristine and resource-rich Mexican land in an imperialistic war, the United States populated the territories with countless settlements — Los Angeles, Las Vegas, El Paso and Santa Fe to name only a few. To this day, aggressive Border Patrols harass innocent Mexican civilians and routinely prevent them from freely moving about in what used to be their own country. The proud Mexican people are constantly humiliated with accusations of drug dealing and trafficking by belligerent Customs Agents. These are just a few examples of America flouting international human rights law, but the list goes on and on. Until the United States ends its colonialist occupation of Mexican lands, including California, Nevada and Arizona, Princeton must divest from all U.S.-owned companies and those that do business with the United States. Now is the time to stand together and right over a century and a half of injustices. Rob Buerki '06

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT