Use the fields below to perform an advanced search of The Princetonian's archives. This will return articles, images, and multimedia relevant to your query. You can also try a Basic search
1000 items found for your search. If no results were found please broaden your search.
(09/22/22 3:36am)
As I was wrapping up my internship experience in July, I began looking into opportunities for the next summer. I thought I had begun the recruitment process quite early, but I soon realized that this was far from the case. In part, this is due to the lack of clear communication from the University, as it underemphasizes the importance of getting started early when it comes to recruiting. As a result, underclass students — particularly those without pre-existing connections and a wealth of resources — are left in the dark until it’s too late.
(09/19/22 4:07am)
When debates about the freedom of speech and expression inevitably arise on college campuses, defenders of free speech explain that the pursuit of truth — the ultimate goal of study — necessitates free speech protections. On the University website, President Christopher Eisgruber ’83 explains that “permitting people to speak freely” fosters an environment of “rigorous, constructive, truth-seeking discussions about questions of consequence.” These talking points took center stage earlier this month in a new first-year orientation event, “Free Expression at Princeton,” which was devoted to making the Class of 2026 aware of Princeton’s Freedom of Expression guidelines and their importance.
(09/19/22 1:30am)
To the Editor:
(09/19/22 2:51am)
The following is a guest contribution and reflects the author’s views alone. For information on how to submit to the Opinion Section, click here.
(09/16/22 2:00am)
This Tuesday, Sept. 13, The Daily Princetonian published an article titled “200+ future humanities majors enroll in CHM 201 this semester” in its Humor section. In many ways, the satirical piece fulfills its purpose: it highlights the intensity and tediousness of General Chemistry I at Princeton. It also touches on concerns powerfully articulated by Lucia Wetherill in her spring 2022 column “The case for lifting up instead of weeding out in Princeton’s pre-med classes.”
(09/15/22 3:10am)
The following is a guest contribution and reflects the author’s views alone. For information on how to submit to the Opinion Section, click here.
(09/14/22 1:02am)
Having been deprived of chicken quesadillas and mass-produced sushi since May, I was eager to return to Frist Campus Center for my first late meal of the year. It came as a surprise to me, then, to discover that food prices at the Food Gallery in Frist had increased from what they were last semester, with most entrées exceeding the Unlimited Dining Plan’s then-allotted $8 late lunch and dinner credit.
(09/13/22 3:25am)
The following is a guest contribution and reflects the author’s views alone. For information on how to submit to the Opinion Section, click here.
(09/13/22 3:02am)
The following is a guest contribution and reflects the author’s views alone. For information on how to submit to the Opinion Section, click here.
(09/12/22 2:08am)
The following is a guest contribution and reflects the author’s views alone. For information on how to submit to the Opinion Section, click here.
(09/12/22 12:38am)
To the Editor:
(09/09/22 2:03am)
Earlier this morning, University President Christopher Eisgruber ’83 announced an enormous increase in student financial aid. Increasing student aid is one of the better uses of the University’s recent financial gains, second only to expanding the student body (which Princeton is also doing). But increasing aid is not enough — Princeton needs to take steps to drastically reduce its sticker price, if not eliminate tuition altogether. Tuition is completely unnecessary to university finances and by keeping its sticker price high, Princeton contributes to tuition inflation across the country where aid is not so plentiful.
(09/08/22 1:41am)
The following is a guest contribution and reflects the author’s views alone. For information on how to submit to the Opinion Section, click here.
(09/08/22 2:18am)
Recently a select group of scientists, scholars, and pundits have denounced key science journals, specifically Scientific American (SciAm) and Science, as going “woke” and joining the “social justice” bandwagon.
(09/07/22 1:36am)
The following is a guest contribution and reflects the author’s views alone. For information on how to submit to the Opinion Section, click here.
(08/17/22 4:56am)
The following is an open letter and reflects the authors’ views alone. For information on how to submit to the Opinion Section, click here.
(08/12/22 5:57pm)
The following is a guest contribution and reflects the author’s views alone. For information on how to submit to the Opinion Section, click here.
(07/20/22 12:59am)
The following is a guest contribution and reflects the author’s views alone. For information on how to submit to the Opinion Section, click here.
(07/20/22 12:23am)
The following is a guest contribution and reflects the author’s views alone. For information on how to submit to the Opinion Section, click here.
(06/29/22 2:52pm)
To the Editor: