Follow us on Instagram
Try our daily mini crossword
Play our latest news quiz
Download our new app on iOS/Android!

Opinion

The Daily Princetonian

Letters to the Editor

A liberal political bias in the Ivy League?Your excellent report on the allegations about liberal political bias in the Ivy League overlooked an important matter: the heavy conservative bias of the person who constructed the poll in question, Frank Luntz.Far from an objective polling researcher, Luntz is a well-known, long-time special interest Republican Party operative who, among other things, helped to cobble together Newt Gingrich's notorious "Contract With America" in 1994.It should also be noted that Luntz has worked for the Enron Corporation and the Christian Coalition as part of their respective political operations.In separate reports in 2000, two widely-respected, independent professional organizations, the American Association of Public Opinion Research and the National Council on Public Polls specifically criticized Luntz for "giving the public unreliable reports" and for designing surveys "more akin to a parlor game than to a public opinion poll."Even a brief study of the "Ivy League" poll results, as published on David Horowitz's web site, shows that this poll, too, is bogus, particularly in its use of loaded questions and false data on the question of reparations for slavery.It comes as no surprise that David Horowitz would uncritically rely on figures from a poll designed by Frank Luntz.The rest of us, including students and faculty, should be a good deal more skeptical, given Luntz's documented background of partisan calculation and manipulation and the glaring infirmities of the current poll. Sean Wilentz Dayton-Stockton Professor of History A liberal political bias in the Ivy League?Sean Wilentz is entitled to practice pop psychology on anyone he pleases, including me ("Is a liberal academia biased against conservative faculty?" article in the Feb.

OPINION | 02/12/2002

ADVERTISEMENT
The Daily Princetonian

The debate about boutique medical services

"Boutique" or "concierge" medical practices are ethical violations and represent America's notorious greed for luxuries and special treatment, as well as this country's outrageous lack of compassion for the less fortunate.American health care is moving farther and farther away from the direction that it needs to move in ? a system that meets the basic medical needs of all citizens, rich or poor.Paying doctors thousands a year so that they can cater to your every medical whim is the latest in luxuries offered only to the richest of Americans.

OPINION | 02/10/2002

The Daily Princetonian

Letters to the Editor

Image of sweatshop-free merchandise is a facadeLess than three years ago, Princeton's students called on the University to end its clothing contracts with companies whose goods were produced under sweatshop conditions.

OPINION | 02/10/2002

The Daily Princetonian

An empty State of the Union

When George W. Bush ? educated at Yale and Harvard, may I remind you ? bombastically declared in his State of the Union Address, "Now, America is embracing a new ethic and a new creed: 'Let's roll,'" I was reminded of my high school's pep rally.

OPINION | 02/06/2002

The Daily Princetonian

Letters to the Editor

Element of exclusivity remains a part of bickerThough I can now sleep easy knowing that Ivy is expecting 15 more people to attend its sessions, I must express some distress over The Daily Princetonian's reporting of the sign-in/bicker process.

OPINION | 02/05/2002

The Daily Princetonian

Oprah's empire

Oprah is one of the greatest ironies of our time. By preaching a gospel of failure, she has become a success story.The way Oprah runs her television talk show is very similar to the way she has made a success of herself.

OPINION | 02/04/2002