When a club initiation becomes hazing
The following is a guest contribution and reflects the author’s views alone. For information on how to submit to the Opinion Section, click here.
Use the fields below to perform an advanced search of The Princetonian's archives. This will return articles, images, and multimedia relevant to your query. You can also try a Basic search
4 items found for your search. If no results were found please broaden your search.
The following is a guest contribution and reflects the author’s views alone. For information on how to submit to the Opinion Section, click here.
Last month, McCarter Theater premiered “The Manic Monologues,” a digital theatrical experience that aiming to disrupt stigma around mental illness.
When exploring the benefits and limitations of representative democracy through art, what better way could there be to do so than by having the audience of said art engage in that kind of democracy themselves? Students used this unique format during “Democracy Theater — City Council Meeting,“ a play born out of the fall freshman seminar FRS 143: “Is Politics a Performance?”
Creating a sequel to a cult classic is a hard task. This task is even harder when the original movie is itself an adaptation of a much-acclaimed sci-fi novel, Philip K. Dick’s “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?” It probably doesn’t come as a surprise, then, that “Blade Runner 2049” does not match the quality of its predecessors, even though it’s a decent action movie. Despite having the potential to level up to and even surpass the original, the film fails to fully develop the themes that made the original “Blade Runner” so captivating.