Reader Comments
Campus conservatives criticize Scalia coverage
Published: Friday, December 14th, 2012
Conservative student leaders on campus criticized the media’s coverage of the interaction between Duncan Hosie ’16 and Supreme Court Associate Justice Antonin Scalia, arguing that the story was over-covered and that coverage generally misrepresented Scalia’s views.
During the ...
(back to the article)
The opinions expressed here are those of the individual commenters and do not necessarily represent the views of The Daily Princetonian Publishing Company, Inc. We do not take responsibility for the opinions, facts, or claims presented by individual commenters, and reserve the right to moderate or delete inappropriate comments.




RSS
Facebook
Twitter
funny to see some of these student republicans in the closet rushing to Scalia's defense
All aboard the butthurt express!
Wa wa wa, why can't they let us be bigots in peace?
1. Duncan was on the frontpage of Washington Post.
2. He was in The New Yorker, La times, Ny times, and almost every single newspaper in the country.
3. Besides being on MSNBC, CNN and NPR profiled him
I'm sorry but this was THE story of the day Tuesday. Duncan's question was actualy 2 minutes, too.
Scalia is a bigot, plain and simple. Gays getting married does not kill people. Murder does. Scalia thinks you can compare the too. You can't.
Shame on all the people who defend Scalia- he is a homophobic menace
Also Duncan was featured on Jon Stewart last night!
I think these Scalia defenders are as disgusting as he is. Makes me want to commit knowing they go here and defend homophobia
One doesn't have to be a homophobe to think that this shit was blown way out of proportion.
I also find it amusing how many gay republicans are flocking to defend Scalia's bigotry.
Hosie rules. That is all.
Ah, good. Meta meta news is my favorite kind of news.
Most overblown news events tend to end with these kinds of meta-articles asking whether the media overcovered the event. In other words, this article answers the question it raises just by existing.