-
Reader Comments

Both referenda pass in USG voting

Written by Ameena Schelling, Managing Editor
Published: Monday, April 25th, 2011

Both referenda on the USG spring election ballot have passed, according to election results released on Friday night.

The first referendum, proposed by Dan May ’11, will eliminate the Honor Committee seat traditionally reserved for the freshman class president and ...

(back to the article)

Viewing 4 comments...

  • 9:07 p.m. on April 22nd, 2011
    Posted by
    '12

    "Incumbent Class of 2012 social chair Aparajita Das was eliminated from the election due to a miscommunication about changes to the USG election procedures."

    WRONG. She was eliminated because she submitted her forms late. Whatever reasons she treated her class government with such contempt are irrelevant.

  • 10:25 p.m. on April 22nd, 2011
    Posted by
    curious

    what about the senior class alumni elections?

  • 12:10 a.m. on April 23rd, 2011
    Posted by
    @'12

    lol

  • 8:38 a.m. on April 23rd, 2011
    Posted by
    Be a legend...

    PLAN AHEAD...every year there is an opportunity to change the Honor Code through referenda. However, the issues need to be addressed early, not the week or even month before these spring USG elections.

    With all the issues discussed here and in other comments sections, debate often and debate early.

    Referenda only require 200 signatures to get on the ballot. But passage will require even more communication and commitment.

    There are too many flaws in the Honor Code to relegate a call to action to the week or even the month before the election.

    Changing the Honor Code would be a remarkable legacy.

Post your comments on this article

Comments:

:

Captcha

For security reasons, please enter the word in the image above.

The Daily Princetonian reserves the right to monitor and delete inappropriate comments.

 


< Back to the article


The opinions expressed here are those of the individual commenters and do not necessarily represent the views of The Daily Princetonian Publishing Company, Inc. We do not take responsibility for the opinions, facts, or claims presented by individual commenters, and reserve the right to moderate or delete inappropriate comments.