-
Reader Comments

Chin ’75 rules on Google book case

Written by Jason Jung, Senior Writer
Published: Friday, March 25th, 2011

U.S. Circuit Court Judge Denny Chin ’75 rejected a proposed settlement between Google, The Authors Guild and The Association of American Publishers that would have allowed the leading Internet search engine company to proceed with its Google Books Search ...

(back to the article)

Viewing 2 comments...

  • 9:12 a.m. on March 25th, 2011
    Posted by
    AlumniWriter

    Hooray for Denny! He's absolutely right that the settlement provides Google a real, not virtual, monopoly on printed matter without compensating authors for use of their material. Google means never having to say you're sorry.

  • 10:24 a.m. on March 25th, 2011
    Posted by
    LY

    "Free access for public libraries" ... right. There would have been one very expensive access station per library and fees for all the non-public-domain books. The settlement, which was only a class action suit (!), would have overturned US Copyright Law and created a huge cash cow for Google, with most authors unaware of their rights ("being informed" by Google of the settlement or their right to opt out meant ads in newspapers, not individual emails to millions of authors). Taking effective control of an industry and violating copyright law in several countries is not the usual purpose of a class action suit. No reason to be sad; now Google, or another corporation, has to come up with a fair deal.

Post your comments on this article

Comments:

:

Captcha

For security reasons, please enter the word in the image above.

The Daily Princetonian reserves the right to monitor and delete inappropriate comments.

 


< Back to the article


The opinions expressed here are those of the individual commenters and do not necessarily represent the views of The Daily Princetonian Publishing Company, Inc. We do not take responsibility for the opinions, facts, or claims presented by individual commenters, and reserve the right to moderate or delete inappropriate comments.