-
Reader Comments

Admissions about admissions

Written by Greg Burnham, Columnist
Published: Tuesday, October 13th, 2009

Correction and editor ...

(back to the article)

Viewing 33 comments...

  • 12:32 a.m. on Oct. 13th, 2009
    Posted by
    Anonymous

    really strong article

  • 12:56 a.m. on Oct. 13th, 2009
    Posted by
    yeah

    agreed

  • 1:06 a.m. on Oct. 13th, 2009
    Posted by
    '11

    greg burnham is my heroooo

  • 1:07 a.m. on Oct. 13th, 2009
    Posted by
    AC

    Great article!

  • 1:12 a.m. on Oct. 13th, 2009
    Posted by
    P'11

    I was wondering how long it would take for someone to take a story on "discrimination" against a totally different race and make it into a story on
    "discrimination" against Jews.

    Really, we're sick of hearing that you're "discriminated" against. You're 1% of the world population and own 99% of the world's money. Keep the money for all I care, but just stop drawing attention to yourselves every second you can.

    Also, I guarantee the first four posts were all written by the same person.

  • 1:30 a.m. on Oct. 13th, 2009
    Posted by
    -

    And your argument is that we need more jews? because keeping them out was the reason that well-roundedness became important, let's see, one hundred and eight years ago? What about the black people who couldn't go to college at all? Shouldn't they get a shot?

  • 1:34 a.m. on Oct. 13th, 2009
    Posted by
    Sophomoric

    Greg, the concern isn't so much Asian vs. white, it's Asian vs. black & Latino.

  • 1:38 a.m. on Oct. 13th, 2009
    Posted by
    chief illiniwek

    "Cultural differences, however, might mean that well-rounded Asian kids would look different than well-rounded white kids. Since our current standards were originally designed by and for WASPs, they may well fail to recognize these success-poised Asian kids."

    soooo even though these standards were designed for wasps, they appear to benefit african american kids? shabbinteresting.

  • 2:12 a.m. on Oct. 13th, 2009
    Posted by
    '11

    What precisely is meant by post-graduation success and why should that be much more significant than academic and extracurricular success while actually AT Princeton? Not everyone with a lucrative job gives back to the university, and if everyone at Princeton spent all four years chasing that lucrative job and only using their time to further their chances of procuring it, what would the atmosphere on campus be like? Significantly more boring and depressing than it already is.

  • 4:40 a.m. on Oct. 13th, 2009
    Posted by
    uk alum

    check out this kid, Tim Sun, Columbia '13- Bwog had a story about him a couple days ago. He's one of the world's fastest Rubik's cube solvers. Not sure if this helps the Asian stereotype, but any college would be lucky to have a guy as sharp as he is, obviously.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_DoGb7vbnQQ&...

Page 1 of 4 | next > | last >>

Post your comments on this article

Comments:

:

Captcha

For security reasons, please enter the word in the image above.

The Daily Princetonian reserves the right to monitor and delete inappropriate comments.

 


< Back to the article


The opinions expressed here are those of the individual commenters and do not necessarily represent the views of The Daily Princetonian Publishing Company, Inc. We do not take responsibility for the opinions, facts, or claims presented by individual commenters, and reserve the right to moderate or delete inappropriate comments.