-
Reader Comments

Men's Squash: Princeton eyes shot at history

Written by Gabriel Debenedetti, Staff Writer
Published: Thursday, February 19th, 2009
One match rarely changes the course of a sport, but last Saturday’s Princeton-Trinity squash match may have done just that.

In stretching the No. 1 Bantams to one of the closest matches between the teams in recent memory, the ...

(back to the article)

Viewing 4 comments...

  • 1:25 a.m. on Feb. 20th, 2009
    Posted by
    Not a regular sports reader

    I really enjoyed the perspective taken on this article. I would never have known about this challenge by Men's Squash otherwise, and am glad to have read it. Keep up the good work. I'd love to hear more about the teams, especially the club sports teams.

  • 11:09 p.m. on Feb. 20th, 2009
    Posted by
    Paper Tiger

    Shouldn't the title of this article be:

    "Princeton Eyes Shot at History.... Again."

    They had a chance to beat Trinity last week too. In fact, every team that goes up against Trinity has that exact same shot at history.

  • 7:11 p.m. on Feb. 22nd, 2009
    Posted by
    Rex

    On the ESPN spotlight segment about Trinity and Princeton today 2-22-09, Coach Callahan was belly-aching about how Trinity doesn't play on a level field, since Trinity gets foreign players and that Princeton can't compete.

    Callahan should look at his roster, since it seems to me that Princeton's “three amigos”: Senior tri-captains No. 1 Mauricio Sanchez, No. 2 Kimlee Wong and No. 6 Hesham El Halaby are not from the Bronx !

    Just give Trinity the credit they deserve !

  • 10:09 p.m. on Feb. 22nd, 2009
    Posted by
    Doug

    Trinity just got the credit they deserve.... it's called the Potter Cup! Congrats on #202, Bantams.

Post your comments on this article

Comments:

:

Captcha

For security reasons, please enter the word in the image above.

The Daily Princetonian reserves the right to monitor and delete inappropriate comments.

 


< Back to the article


The opinions expressed here are those of the individual commenters and do not necessarily represent the views of The Daily Princetonian Publishing Company, Inc. We do not take responsibility for the opinions, facts, or claims presented by individual commenters, and reserve the right to moderate or delete inappropriate comments.