Reader Comments

USG rules Bill Pang '12 overspent on campaign

Written by Michelle Wu, Staff Writer
Published: Thursday, October 16th, 2008

In a closed-door executive session on Tuesday night, the USG Senate upheld its original decision to declare Austin Hollimon ’12 freshman class treasurer, rejecting an appeal by Bill Pang ’12 to overturn his disqualification.

Though Pang received a majority of ...

(back to the article)

Viewing 6 comments...

  • 2:39 a.m. on Oct. 16th, 2008
    Posted by
    AC

    'Tis just as well. A treasurer who can't count or spend under budget probably isn't somebody worth having in office anyway...

  • 10:36 a.m. on Oct. 16th, 2008
    Posted by
    2012 SUPPORTER

    This is an outrage. Bill Pang had a clear mandate from the great Princeton Class of 2012 to be a leader. A mandate for change-- for more study breaks. For longer late-meal hours. For two-ply toilet paper. The Class of 2012 will not stand for this. Democracy will be served.

  • 5:35 p.m. on Oct. 16th, 2008
    Posted by
    @2012

    longer late-meal hours? two-ply toilet paper? being class treasurer doesn't put him in a position to bring about these changes. i agree with AC. if he can't be careful enough with following rules, reading the fine print, and filling out paper work, he probably shouldn't be treasurer.

  • 6:11 p.m. on Oct. 16th, 2008
    Posted by
    Pripar12

    To make n pieces of 2-ply paper, we need 2n pieces of 1-ply paper. Then fold it in half.
    Proof: 1x2n=2x1n Q.E.D.

  • 7:59 p.m. on Oct. 16th, 2008
    Posted by
    Will Scharf '08

    I agree with the decision the USG made, but I don't think that changes the fact that USG election rules are unnecessarily restrictive. Speaking as a former USG presidential candidate, I think the budgeting formula for flyers is particularly ridiculous, even if one accepts the idea of a spending cap as necessary.

  • 3:30 a.m. on Oct. 21st, 2008
    Posted by
    i'm sorry, but bill is def not qualified.

    he spent 40 dollars when he had a 30 dollar budget. that means he was 33.333 percent off in his handling of money. Is that someone you want to trust with your budget? Of course not. AC is right. 2012 supporter is dumb and probably biased.

Post your comments on this article

Comments:

:

Captcha

For security reasons, please enter the word in the image above.

The Daily Princetonian reserves the right to monitor and delete inappropriate comments.

 


< Back to the article


The opinions expressed here are those of the individual commenters and do not necessarily represent the views of The Daily Princetonian Publishing Company, Inc. We do not take responsibility for the opinions, facts, or claims presented by individual commenters, and reserve the right to moderate or delete inappropriate comments.