RSS
Facebook
Twitter
E-PrinceThough the four-year residential college system is too new to produce any reliable trends, more members of the Class of 2009 switched out of the system for their senior year than chose to join it, statistics show.
For the Class ...
(back to the article)
The opinions expressed here are those of the individual commenters and do not necessarily represent the views of The Daily Princetonian Publishing Company, Inc. We do not take responsibility for the opinions, facts, or claims presented by individual commenters, and reserve the right to moderate or delete inappropriate comments.
Don't worry kids, percentages are hard! % of seniors != % of seniors living in four year colleges. Would you have us believe that things adding up to 100% is a remarkable coincidence?
More proof that the failed policies of Shirley Tilghman and her administration are only exacerbating social inequalities on campus and general discontent.
Hodgeman's dorm allocation plan was a failure this year as there was a waiting list for upperclassmen housing and excess empty rooms in four-year colleges. Juniors who couldn't get rooms in upperclassmen housing were forced into four-years and had to buy a contract against their will.
Couldn't the reporters have found and interviewed a) students who were from the other 4-year residential college, Mathey or b) students who chose to stay in the 4-year residential college?
This article just doesn't to fairly explore/represent all sides of the story, and it's not like there are that many sides to begin with.
hahahah if anything there was an enormous wait-list for 4-yr college housing. Upperclass waitlist is immaterial as bloomberg and cuyler revert back next year.