Reader Comments

A hurried welcome

Written by Daily Princetonian Editorial Board, Staff
Published: Monday, May 5th, 2008
After a long summer away from Princeton, many students are eager to return to school. This year, they will have to wait an extra three days. According to a schedule posted on the Housing Office's website, move-in day ...(back to the article)

Viewing 8 comments...

  • 1.
    2:50 p.m. on May 6th, 2008
    Posted by @'09

    Princeton tends to take pride in its undergraduate focus. Isn't it a bit disingenuous to use that as pr material and then proceed to ignore student interests on a decision like this?

    Current Rating: 0 (0 Ups and 0 Downs)
    Thumbs Up!  Thumbs Down!
  • 2.
    11:07 a.m. on May 6th, 2008
    Posted by 08

    they'd better be more willing to allow students to move in early, then. our club sports team requested early move in last year to prepare for our first game, which was the saturday before classes started, and were refused.

    Current Rating: 0 (0 Ups and 0 Downs)
    Thumbs Up!  Thumbs Down!
  • 3.
    10:15 a.m. on May 6th, 2008
    Posted by '09

    Lets face it: Princeton is just not "undergaduate-centered" - it is faculty and administration -centered.

    Current Rating: 0 (0 Ups and 0 Downs)
    Thumbs Up!  Thumbs Down!
  • 4.
    7:17 p.m. on May 5th, 2008
    Posted by Anonymous

    Re: "Why we don't fight" Hunger strike! Go!

    Current Rating: 0 (0 Ups and 0 Downs)
    Thumbs Up!  Thumbs Down!
  • 5.
    12:57 p.m. on May 5th, 2008
    Posted by Huzzah

    Yet another idiotic example of how the University has failed to consult students to add to this list: http://usg.princeton.edu/files/ReferendumFreeResponse.pdf

    Current Rating: 0 (0 Ups and 0 Downs)
    Thumbs Up!  Thumbs Down!
  • 6.
    11:45 a.m. on May 5th, 2008
    Posted by Crusty Alum

    Terrible change. Not surprising though.

    Current Rating: 0 (0 Ups and 0 Downs)
    Thumbs Up!  Thumbs Down!
  • 7.
    10:37 a.m. on May 5th, 2008
    Posted by 08

    Agreed. This new schedule would definitely be a change for the worse.

    Current Rating: 0 (0 Ups and 0 Downs)
    Thumbs Up!  Thumbs Down!
  • 8.
    11:26 p.m. on May 4th, 2008
    Posted by Anonymous

    Hear, hear!

    Current Rating: 0 (0 Ups and 0 Downs)
    Thumbs Up!  Thumbs Down!

Post your comments on this article

Comments:

:

Captcha

For security reasons, please enter the word in the image above.

 


< Back to the article


The opinions expressed here are those of the individual commenters and do not necessarily represent the views of The Daily Princetonian Publishing Company, Inc. We do not take responsibility for the opinions, facts, or claims presented by individual commenters, and reserve the right to moderate or delete inappropriate comments.