Reader Comments

Lest we be condemned to live in paradise alone

Written by Brendan Carroll, Contributing Columnist
Published: Wednesday, April 16th, 2008
When Alfred Lord Tennyson wrote, "Tis better to have loved and lost than never to have loved at all," he was referring to the death of a friend, not a romance that hit the rocks. This is not widely remembered ...(back to the article)

Viewing 14 comments...

  • 1.
    7:06 p.m. on April 17th, 2008
    Posted by Thaddeus Fletcher-Turenne

    I, too, found this item well written, with one curious lapse. Implicitly, the distinction between "philos" and "eros" is part of the author's point, yet it is not specifically identified. I realize that hardly any of us study Greek (beyond memorizing the alphabet for one insane purpose or another!), but it used to be something valued in academe. Alas, it is all too common in contemporary to society for the meanings of "philos" and "eros" to be confused!

    Current Rating: 0 (0 Ups and 0 Downs)
    Thumbs Up!  Thumbs Down!
  • 2.
    12:06 a.m. on April 17th, 2008
    Posted by Beeker

    I must admit, I'm really curious: what on earth do baristas have to do with any of this?

    Current Rating: 0 (0 Ups and 0 Downs)
    Thumbs Up!  Thumbs Down!
  • 3.
    10:45 p.m. on April 16th, 2008
    Posted by P 11

    I think this column was interesting and well-written! Good stuff.

    Current Rating: 0 (0 Ups and 0 Downs)
    Thumbs Up!  Thumbs Down!
  • 4.
    6:42 p.m. on April 16th, 2008
    Posted by @Erudite?

    ??

    Current Rating: 0 (0 Ups and 0 Downs)
    Thumbs Up!  Thumbs Down!
  • 5.
    5:55 p.m. on April 16th, 2008
    Posted by @@So Erudite

    So I guess your attitude toward Lewis is emblematic, on the other hand, of one of the major problems facing baristas today.

    Current Rating: 0 (0 Ups and 0 Downs)
    Thumbs Up!  Thumbs Down!
  • 6.
    4:34 p.m. on April 16th, 2008
    Posted by @So Erudite

    @So Erudite. C.S. Lewis is a great, great thinker. No, I'm not kidding. Does that answer your question? Your dismissive attitude towards thinkers like Lewis is emblematic of one of the major problems facing academia today...

    Current Rating: 0 (0 Ups and 0 Downs)
    Thumbs Up!  Thumbs Down!
  • 7.
    1 p.m. on April 16th, 2008
    Posted by Masturbation Prevents Cancer

    This is why anscombers shouldn't argue against premarital sexual activity based on health reasons: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/3072021.stm

    Current Rating: 0 (0 Ups and 0 Downs)
    Thumbs Up!  Thumbs Down!
  • 8.
    11:39 a.m. on April 16th, 2008
    Posted by To Spell-Check

    "Loath" and "Loathe" are two different words- Loath means to be unwilling to do something, while Loathe means to hate. The author used the right one. http://www.wsu.edu/~brians/errors/loath.html http://englishplus.com/grammar/00000238.htm

    Current Rating: 0 (0 Ups and 0 Downs)
    Thumbs Up!  Thumbs Down!
  • 9.
    10:40 a.m. on April 16th, 2008
    Posted by Me

    I second @ So Erudite. It's a very well-written article. Lighten up.

    Current Rating: 0 (0 Ups and 0 Downs)
    Thumbs Up!  Thumbs Down!
  • 10.
    9:55 a.m. on April 16th, 2008
    Posted by @So Erudite

    I meant 20th century, of course, sorry.

    Current Rating: 0 (0 Ups and 0 Downs)
    Thumbs Up!  Thumbs Down!
  • 11.
    9:54 a.m. on April 16th, 2008
    Posted by @So Erudite

    1. I count one Latin typo, singular. It got past the editor too. Typos happen. 2. Pedestrian writing style? On the contrary, it was very well written. 3. C.S. Lewis is one of the most respected thinkers of the 21st century. He is not a "pop intellectual." 4. Accusing someone of making "vapid generalizations" has become a very popular way of dismissing an argument. I would argue that you made a few of your own.

    Current Rating: 0 (0 Ups and 0 Downs)
    Thumbs Up!  Thumbs Down!
  • 12.
    9:42 a.m. on April 16th, 2008
    Posted by Spell-Check

    loath? you mean loathe, Brendan.

    Current Rating: 0 (0 Ups and 0 Downs)
    Thumbs Up!  Thumbs Down!
  • 13.
    8:21 a.m. on April 16th, 2008
    Posted by Best Friends And Lovers

    Brendan, you've confused the situation here when you write "Anscombe, in its turn, rebels against a status quo that confuses morality with medicine." In fact, most Anscombe opponents do not think that consensual sex is a matter of right or wrong. It is an amoral act. On the other hand, Anscombers confuse morality with medicine when they make claims like premarital sex is wrong because it can cause an oxytocin rush in women that causes them to bond in a way that premarital relationships cannot fulfill. In addition, you have completely ignored the possibility that one's lover could simultaneously be one's best friend. I consider my boyfriend to be my best friend in the sense you described: facing common interests, goals, and values together. And of course we love one another in the romantic sense of the word. But, guess what, we're not married yet. Why not? Because we're only 21 and we don't need a legal contract to demonstrate our commitment to one another.

    Current Rating: 0 (0 Ups and 0 Downs)
    Thumbs Up!  Thumbs Down!
  • 14.
    2:34 a.m. on April 16th, 2008
    Posted by So Erudite

    So between the Latin typos, the author's self-avowed ignorance on every subject the article treats, the pedestrian writing-style, the reliance on pop intellectuals (C.S. Lewis? Are you kidding?), and the vapid generalizations ("All philosophers, to the best of my knowledge, grant that friendship is a love and call it by that name."), why exactly does this kid have a column again?

    Current Rating: 0 (0 Ups and 0 Downs)
    Thumbs Up!  Thumbs Down!

Post your comments on this article

Comments:

:

Captcha

For security reasons, please enter the word in the image above.

 


< Back to the article


The opinions expressed here are those of the individual commenters and do not necessarily represent the views of The Daily Princetonian Publishing Company, Inc. We do not take responsibility for the opinions, facts, or claims presented by individual commenters, and reserve the right to moderate or delete inappropriate comments.