-
Reader Comments

N.J. voting technology in question after discrepancies in February vote

Written by Josephine Wolff, Senior Writer
Published: Monday, April 14th, 2008
Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-N.Y.) and Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) were declared winners of the New Jersey presidential primaries, but the ongoing investigation of the discrepancies recorded by several of the state’s electronic voting machines shows that some of ...(back to the article)

Viewing 3 comments...

  • 9:39 p.m. on April 14th, 2008
    Posted by
    '10

    Rather boring, dense and dull.

  • 10:16 p.m. on April 14th, 2008
    Posted by
    Appreciative, in Ohio

    Excellent review of a critical public issue, and the courageous role of Professors Appel and Felten in securing election integrity-- i.e., that votes are counted and reported as voters cast them.

  • 9:15 a.m. on April 15th, 2008
    Posted by
    Democracy Champion

    This is a key question: Is corporate profit and reputation more important than a democracy that works? Seems like the state has an interest in both, but certainly the role of government as a protector of institutional values would seem to suggest that it should exercise the option to protect democracy for all people in New Jersey rather than the profits of a small group of investors and corporate employees. Heresy, I know...

Post your comments on this article

Comments:

:

Captcha

For security reasons, please enter the word in the image above.

The Daily Princetonian reserves the right to monitor and delete inappropriate comments.

 


< Back to the article


The opinions expressed here are those of the individual commenters and do not necessarily represent the views of The Daily Princetonian Publishing Company, Inc. We do not take responsibility for the opinions, facts, or claims presented by individual commenters, and reserve the right to moderate or delete inappropriate comments.