Reader Comments

Two steps forward, one step back

Written by Barry Caro, Associate Editor for Opinion
Published: Friday, March 14th, 2008
The insurgents bet that they were thinking longer term than the sated masses. After all, they thought, the battle to reshape the Street would last decades: Students only stay for four years, and new freshmen would have no conception of ...(back to the article)

Viewing 5 comments...

  • 1.
    12:02 p.m. on March 15th, 2008
    Posted by Re:Anonymous

    Also, demand for regular draw has not diminished ("All draws are oversubscribed this year"). Students are merely signing up for both to hedge their bets and see where they get the best draw time.

    Current Rating: 0 (0 Ups and 0 Downs)
    Thumbs Up!  Thumbs Down!
  • 2.
    noon on March 15th, 2008
    Posted by Re: Anonymous

    Re: Anonymous The problem is that every room subtracted from the upperclassman housing means one less student in an eating club. The University promised last year in the runup to the 4yr college implementation that upperclass students would never take up more than 250 spots, and thus would not have an effect on the financial viability of the street. The choice made between upperclassman housing and residential college housing is artificially biased, with the university giving out significantly extra floor space per person in the latter to bribe students, so that what would be a quad in upperclassman housing becomes a 3-room double in Mathey. They are then subsidizing this pet project with my housing fees that should go towards upperclassman dorms, which largely haven't been renovated in years and for which the university has no plans to renovate for the next 10 yrs at least.

    Current Rating: 0 (0 Ups and 0 Downs)
    Thumbs Up!  Thumbs Down!
  • 3.
    3:37 p.m. on March 14th, 2008
    Posted by Help Us!

    help independent students!! princetonusg.com!!! THANKS :)

    Current Rating: 0 (0 Ups and 0 Downs)
    Thumbs Up!  Thumbs Down!
  • 4.
    2:35 p.m. on March 14th, 2008
    Posted by Anonymous

    The university finds out how many upperclassmen are interested in drawing into residential colleges. It then adjusts the number of rooms available in the four year colleges in order to satisfy demand. These rooms are subtracted from regular upperclassman housing because the regular draw has correspondingly diminished. What exactly is the problem here?

    Current Rating: 0 (0 Ups and 0 Downs)
    Thumbs Up!  Thumbs Down!
  • 5.
    9:07 a.m. on March 14th, 2008
    Posted by Why?

    I really don't understand why Whitman is looking for more dorms to engulf... shouldn't they have planned for this high demand and built a bigger building??? Why should independents pay the price for this lack of foresight?

    Current Rating: 0 (0 Ups and 0 Downs)
    Thumbs Up!  Thumbs Down!

Post your comments on this article

Comments:

:

Captcha

For security reasons, please enter the word in the image above.

 


< Back to the article


The opinions expressed here are those of the individual commenters and do not necessarily represent the views of The Daily Princetonian Publishing Company, Inc. We do not take responsibility for the opinions, facts, or claims presented by individual commenters, and reserve the right to moderate or delete inappropriate comments.