The number of shared meal plans offered at Charter Club will decrease from 30 to 17 after the administration requested that the club pay the University three times the amount it did last year per shared meal plan.
Charter will offer ...(back to the article)
The opinions expressed here are those of the individual commenters and do not necessarily represent the views of The Daily Princetonian Publishing Company, Inc. We do not take responsibility for the opinions, facts, or claims presented by individual commenters, and reserve the right to moderate or delete inappropriate comments.
The original headline read "Charter cuts shared meal plans." This definitely implies that Charter cut their shared meal plan option.
Anyone else amused by the fact that despite the sensationalist headline and tone of the article, their total is still the 2nd highest? Even their 5 junior plans is tied right now for 2nd among the clubs
No, it doesn't. "Corzine plan to cut jobs could pinch state services" http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/09/nyregion/09cu... -- that implies that Corzine will cut the number of jobs, not eliminate them entirely, just as this headline implies that Charter will cut meal plan numbers, not eliminate them entirely.
This is a bad headline. "Cutting" shared meal plans implies that they totally eliminated them.