Reader Comments

Webmail for tomorrow

Written by Daily Princetonian Staff,
Published: Friday, February 15th, 2008

The start of the semester ushered in a 1GB e-mail quota. This five-fold increase from 200MB starts to address the frustration of students who are incessantly required to delete e-mails from their overflowing inboxes. Nonetheless, the quota remains far below ...(back to the article)

Viewing 4 comments...

  • 1.
    5:50 p.m. on Feb. 15th, 2008
    Posted by John

    Happy Email User: I agree that asking for more storage space was a bit silly. But I still think that increased storage space (at least in my opinion) isn't addressing the main problems with the client, such as having to constantly reload the webpage in hopes of seeing one's inbox messages. If OIT's upgrades had been major and had addressed problems such as this (and had left smaller issues for later), I would also think the article unappreciative. However, because the OIT upgrades were small and didn't address the more important issues, I think the article's complaints were well justified.

    Current Rating: 0 (0 Ups and 0 Downs)
    Thumbs Up!  Thumbs Down!
  • 2.
    3:45 p.m. on Feb. 15th, 2008
    Posted by Happy Email User

    John: I understood the point of the article - the increase in e-mail was only a small step toward a better e-mail service for the university community. What I was trying to say is that we should be thankful and appreciative for this small step. Instead, the ed-board used this event to try to bring out e-mail improvements that OIT missed. I suppose it could go either way, but I don't think it was appropriate for the ed-board to ask OIT for more improvements right after they expanded our e-mail space. Plus, the ed-board compared our e-mail space to G-Mail's 6 GB. I think that pretty much said, "OIT, you tried, but you didn't do a good job."

    Current Rating: 0 (0 Ups and 0 Downs)
    Thumbs Up!  Thumbs Down!
  • 3.
    3:59 a.m. on Feb. 15th, 2008
    Posted by John

    I think "Happy Email User" is missing the point of the article. Increased storage space doesn't solve the other issues with the webmail client, which the authors of the article mentioned. I hope the commenter will read articles more carefully next time before he or she decides to to post.

    Current Rating: 0 (0 Ups and 0 Downs)
    Thumbs Up!  Thumbs Down!
  • 4.
    3:29 a.m. on Feb. 15th, 2008
    Posted by Happy Email User

    Why do you have to hate? We got 1 GB of storage and that's plenty. Post this editorial when we're not getting 1 gb of storage. You shouldn't ask for more right after you get a 400% increase in your e-mail.

    Current Rating: 0 (0 Ups and 0 Downs)
    Thumbs Up!  Thumbs Down!

Post your comments on this article

Comments:

:

Captcha

For security reasons, please enter the word in the image above.

 


< Back to the article


The opinions expressed here are those of the individual commenters and do not necessarily represent the views of The Daily Princetonian Publishing Company, Inc. We do not take responsibility for the opinions, facts, or claims presented by individual commenters, and reserve the right to moderate or delete inappropriate comments.